- NIL Wire
- Posts
- š Three Complaints against House, Minus the Legal-speak
š Three Complaints against House, Minus the Legal-speak
Hey there,
What a weekend of college football. Weāve finally exited the dark ages of college sports, which means that the next time we donāt have college football or basketball on television will be in April. Thatās not a bad deal at all!
You know what is a bad deal though? The House Settlement, at least according to some folks. Thereās been three big legal complaints filed against the settlement, which could alter the deal dramatically if accepted.
If youāre a college sports die-hard, you need to understand whatās at stake with this settlement. Thatās why weāre breaking down these three complaints, but avoiding all of the legal jargon that comes with them. Whether youāre an Athletic Director, Collective head, or super-fan, this oneās really important.
ā¦But itās only available to All-Access subscribers. Donāt worry, though ā itās not going to break the bank to become an All Access member. Upgrade your subscription today to get access to the best NIL-related content in the country.
ā Cole, Justin and Collin
Three Complaints against House, Minus the Legal-speak
Now that weāve had some time to take in the details, I think we can all agree on one thing: the House v. NCAA settlement is perfect.
Just kidding!
In all my years, Iām not sure Iāve seen anything as unifying as the perceived inadequacy of the House settlement. Weāre talking about Michigan fans joining arms with Ohio State fans, all rising in a chorus to say that they hate the agreement for one reason or another. Itās the proposal vs everyone else.
But, while everyone seems to be frustrated by the proposal, thereās very little agreement on what exactly is wrong. Some stakeholders, like collectives, are frustrated by the dealās expanded oversight. Others feel the deal insufficiently addresses Title IX concerns. And then thereās many administrators panicking about whether the deal will sink their athletic department.